<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Monkey Patching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/</link>
	<description>Matt Michie&#039;s rants, raves, and thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 10:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: shywolf9982</title>
		<link>http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/comment-page-1/#comment-18003</link>
		<dc:creator>shywolf9982</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 01:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/#comment-18003</guid>
		<description>Funny is, I&#039;m a Plone developer and I ended up here because I needed to patch Zope 2.9.8 and doing a monkeypatch is the fastest solution to check if your solution works before applying for a patch to Zope itself.
When finally we&#039;ll be able to get rid of Zope 2 and we&#039;ll get to Zope 3, there will be no need to monkeypatch again.
Also, I can understand much of the diffidence that surrounds Zope, being that version 2 was rather cryptic at times and version 3 is more a J2EE class product than a quick-and-agile framework (although MUCH more agile than J2EE, and offering almost all of the feature of it)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny is, I&#8217;m a Plone developer and I ended up here because I needed to patch Zope 2.9.8 and doing a monkeypatch is the fastest solution to check if your solution works before applying for a patch to Zope itself.<br />
When finally we&#8217;ll be able to get rid of Zope 2 and we&#8217;ll get to Zope 3, there will be no need to monkeypatch again.<br />
Also, I can understand much of the diffidence that surrounds Zope, being that version 2 was rather cryptic at times and version 3 is more a J2EE class product than a quick-and-agile framework (although MUCH more agile than J2EE, and offering almost all of the feature of it)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmichie</title>
		<link>http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/comment-page-1/#comment-9632</link>
		<dc:creator>mmichie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/#comment-9632</guid>
		<description>Yes, Plone does have a good reputation, I guess the main problem we have with Zope at work is an application built on Zope is always breaking.  Probably not fair to blame Python or Zope, but that&#039;s human nature, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Plone does have a good reputation, I guess the main problem we have with Zope at work is an application built on Zope is always breaking.  Probably not fair to blame Python or Zope, but that&#8217;s human nature, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiberiu Ichim</title>
		<link>http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/comment-page-1/#comment-9630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiberiu Ichim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 18:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hivearchive.com/2007/05/24/understanding-monkey-patching/#comment-9630</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure who will blame Zope for Python&#039;s reputation (as Zope has quite a good reputation, see for example Plone, Zope&#039;s best known product). Also, I&#039;m pretty sure monkeypatching is just as disregarded in Zope as it is in the rest of Python. Yes, monkeypatching is done in Zope (mostly by Plone and add-ons, from my knowledge), but it&#039;s wrong to say that &quot;Zope does Monkey Patching&quot;. Zope can do it just like any other Python software. 

Zope 3 (Zope community&#039;s next effort in developing a web platform) goes a long way in fixing Zope 2 shortcomings. Hopefully this would increase Zope&#039;s reputation in the Python community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure who will blame Zope for Python&#8217;s reputation (as Zope has quite a good reputation, see for example Plone, Zope&#8217;s best known product). Also, I&#8217;m pretty sure monkeypatching is just as disregarded in Zope as it is in the rest of Python. Yes, monkeypatching is done in Zope (mostly by Plone and add-ons, from my knowledge), but it&#8217;s wrong to say that &#8220;Zope does Monkey Patching&#8221;. Zope can do it just like any other Python software. </p>
<p>Zope 3 (Zope community&#8217;s next effort in developing a web platform) goes a long way in fixing Zope 2 shortcomings. Hopefully this would increase Zope&#8217;s reputation in the Python community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
